Literary Analysis (Staple this page to the front of
your essay)
Student Name: _________________________
Paper 2: Literary Analysis (Adapted from page 188 of Deans)
Due Date: Check syllabus
Length: 750-1000
words, minimum
Value: 15%
of your final grade
Description: Write
an essay about AngelaÕs Ashes. The
essay should build on the strategies for reading literature outlined below
(starting on page 188 of Deans) and employ the rhetorical strategies for
writing about literature and culture detailed later in the chapter. A range of
potential topics can be developed by thinking about the topics of in-class
discussion such as the following: narrative point of view, narrative style and
irony, hardship and individual responsibility. If you would like to discuss
potential topics, make an appointment to meet with me in person and have some
possible topics in mind.
Sources: None
are required beyond AngelaÕs Ashes.
All sources should be formatted in MLA style.
|
Writing Skills Evaluation |
Excellent |
Average |
Weak |
||
|
|
High |
Low |
|
High |
Low |
|
Quality
of Thought |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Recognition/examination
of complex ideas Credible
and logical support Thesis |
Thesis is
clearly stated and is argumentative. Unified and strong control of content.
Opinions and claims are well-supported. Ample evidence. Logic is maintained.
Paper is ambitious and insightful. Original ideas are presented, not
repetitions of class discussion. |
Thesis is
vague or not clearly argumentative. Generally unified. Ideas are balanced.
Opinions and claims are adequately supported and usually logical. Paper is
ambitious but quality is inconsistent. Ideas are repetitions of class
discussion. |
Thesis is
hard to find. Little evidence of control of ideas. Ideas are not supported,
or support is clichˇd or illogical. Paper is not ambitious or insightful.
Ideas are largely obvious to any reader or are a repetition of what was said
in class. |
||
|
Clarity
of Purpose |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Clear
purpose Audience
awareness |
Positions
are insightful and clear. Thesis is focused; intent is obvious. Clear sense
of audience. |
Positions
are sound and understandable. Thesis is general; intent is evident. Somewhat
aware of audience. |
Lacks
position on topics. Thesis may be absent or intent is unclear. Superficial.
Little to no recognition of audience. |
||
|
Organization
of Content |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Arrangement Unity Coherence |
Ideas are
well connected through structural and linguistic transitions. Structure
complements and completes content. |
Some
evidence of structural and linguistic transitions. Structure is generally
adequate for the content. |
Overall
unity and coherence are flawed. Parts are poorly connected, and there is
little evidence of planning or organization. |
||
|
|
|||||
Language and Style/Voice |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Vocabulary Register Tone |
Exhibits
confident, skillful use of language. Uses a varied, accurate, and appropriate
vocabulary. Sentences are purposefully designed and matched to content. |
Exhibits
adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language. Uses generally
appropriate vocabulary and varied sentences. |
Displays
little facility in the use of language. Uses limited vocabulary or
inappropriate word choice. Sentences are basic. Paper may be repetitive or
wordy. |
||
|
Mechanics |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Grammar
and usage Punctuation Spelling |
Grammatical
structures are well-chosen. No errors detract from meaning. |
Grammatical
structures carry the meaning forward, although readers notice occasional
error(s). |
Grammar
errors are so obtrusive that readers are seriously distracted by them. |
||
|
Research
/ Citations |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
MLA
formatting Number of
citations Evidence
from the text |
Clear
attribution and accurate documentation. In-text citations and works cited
page are correct. Proper use of signal phrases. Uses multiple examples from
the text. |
Some
evidence of citations in text and on works cited page. Inconsistent use of
MLA formatting. Uses a few examples from the text. |
Little or
no use of signal phrases. Significant errors in formatting in-text and works
cited page citations. Uses two or three examples from the text. |
||
Essays
plagiarized or not written on the essay assignment will receive a score of
zero.
|
TOTAL
SCORE: |
COMMENTS: |